Stories, insights, and updates from our community
Building a digital space for desire sounds simple until you try it. The words data, privacy, and pleasure rarely share a sentence comfortably. Most tech products start with scale and convenience; we started with vulnerability. What happens when the thing you’re designing for is not just connection, but for some a place to learn the importance of consent?
There is a pervasive, almost biological imperative that demands we leave our houses. I have never fully understood it. The house is where the books are. It is where the temperature is controlled, the coffee is of an acceptable standard, and the people—specifically, me—are generally tolerable.
Ultimately, the concept of the Pink Vote is a relic of a time when we needed to be counted to matter. It was a survival mechanism. "Look at us, we are many, we have money, please don't arrest us." But now? Now we are just citizens.
There is a specific frequency of silence that occurs when two men cross paths in a space designated for the nocturnal hunt. It is not the silence of a library, nor the silence of a church, though it shares the latter’s pretension of reverence. It is the silence of a marketplace where the currency is unspoken. The glance—that split-second calibration of interest, threat, and geometry—is elevated to the status of a contract.
Biology is stubborn. We are primates who evolved to communicate through pheromones and touch, not through fiber-optic cables.
The architectural genius of the Catholic Church lay in the invention of the confessional box. It was a triumph of interior design: a small, dark, wooden closet where one could whisper one’s darkest deviations to a man who was professionally obligated to forget them. There was a screen. There was a separation.
There was a time, perhaps in the sepia-toned memories of the mid-twentieth century, when the political Left concerned itself with things that actually existed. They talked about coal, steel, wages, and the distinct possibility that the man who owned the factory was eating a steak while the man who worked in it was eating a potato. It was a philosophy of materialism, grounded in the hard, grimy reality of economic distribution.
We should be wary of anyone who claims to know what is best for another person's psyche. The human mind is a terrifying labyrinth. Some people navigate it with a map and a flashlight; others navigate it by feeling the walls in the dark. To claim that the former is superior to the latter is just administrative vanity.
On one side, we have the Right, who view us as the harbingers of civilizational collapse; on the other, the Left, who view us as fragile porcelain dolls that must be wrapped in cotton wool and paraded around as totems of their own virtue.
The critic lives in a world of teleology, where the end justifies the means. They are the tourists who sprint through the Louvre to see the Mona Lisa just so they can say they saw it, ignoring the miles of canvas in between. To them, kink without sex is "incomplete." To the connoisseur, it is the only form of play that is truly pure, precisely because it refuses to bow to the tyranny of the biological imperative. It is the difference between drinking wine to get drunk and drinking wine to taste the grapes.
For most fetish photographers, an image must suggest more than it shows. It must invite the viewer to complete the picture with their own filthy imagination. This is the difference between art and pornography. Pornography is the tyranny of the explicit; it leaves no room for the mind. Art thrives on the missing information.
True freedom, the kind that actually allows a person to breathe, is the freedom of ambiguity. It is the freedom to walk into a room and not have to explain who you are. It is the freedom to be misperceived, to be a mystery, to be a question mark rather than a statement.
There is a specific, theatrical gasp reserved for the topic of sex work. You hear it in parliament, you read it in the editorials of newspapers that are otherwise only useful for wrapping fish, and you see it on the faces of suburbanites who have just realized that the massage parlor down the street offers a happy ending. It is a performance of shock so contrived, so utterly devoid of sincerity, that it deserves an Academy Award.
It is that time of year again when the streets of our metropolises are paved with glitter and good intentions. The corporate calendar has marked the month of June as the designated period for "Joy," a mandate enforced with the same rigor as tax collection. We are witnessing the annual migration of the Pride Parade, a spectacle that has evolved from a desperate, blood-soaked riot against police brutality into a synchronized marketing activation for multinational banks.
There was a time when the leather bar was a place of sensory hostility. It smelled of stale beer, industrial cleaner, unwashed bodies, and the distinct, acrid scent of cured animal hide that had been sweating in a dark room for four hours. It was a smell that triggered a primitive flight response in the uninitiated and a Pavlovian salvation in the deviant.
There is a specific, bitter irony in the act of suspension bondage while the world outside is effectively suspended in a state of geopolitical freefall.
There is a peculiar fantasy currently gripping the legislative bodies of Europe. It is a dry, paper-scented fantasy, born in committee rooms where the lighting is harsh and the coffee is lukewarm. The fantasy is this: that human sexuality, a chaotic, fluid, and biologically messy affair that has baffled poets and scientists for millennia, can be tamed by the rigid syntax of the law.
There is a charming, albeit naive, notion that once one steps out of the closet, one enters a Utopia of unconditional acceptance. We imagine the "Gay Community" as a monolithic sanctuary, a warm bath of solidarity where every variation of human desire is greeted with a nod of understanding.
Berlin is not a city in the traditional sense; it is a diagnosis. It is a mood swing codified into municipal law and connected by a public transport system that is suspiciously efficient given the chaotic state of the people riding it. To the uninitiated, specifically the waves of wide-eyed queer pilgrims who arrive with a suitcase full of leather and a head full of dreams, it promises transcendence. It promises a Utopia of concrete and permissiveness where one can finally "be oneself." This is, of course, a trap.
Try adjusting your search or filter criteria
